The Cinematic Version of Catholicism

The following is an article written in the format found in The Catholic Hipster Handbook. Meaning it will have a Topic Article, Cool Saint, Forgotten Prayer, and Activity. This is written partially as a daydream, a creative writing exercise where I asked myself "If I had contributed something to The Catholic Hipster Handbook, what would it look like?". If you happen to enjoy this post, feel free to check out my thoughts on the book here or better yet go out and buy the book to enjoy the many great things it has to offer. Hopefully Tommy and fellow contributors will find this imitation a form of flattery instead of the bizarre fanboy weirdness that is actually is...

Most of us have seen The Sound of Music, The Passion of the Christ, Les Miserables, and even Sister Act...and even The Exorcist. Sometimes you may have sat down with parents or grandparents who were watching a movie on TV and you might've seen Bing Crosby or Pat O'Brien playing a priest or Jennifer Jones portraying St. Bernadette. Point being that there's just those staple movies involving Catholicism that most of the American population has seen and it makes it feel like there's a very limited representation of Catholicism on the Silver Screen.

In some ways, it may feel like the Catholic faith and the movies just don't really get along. Sure, there's those golden oldies from back in the day, but really, since the end of the Hays Code when American society started becoming more secular and relativistic,  how many good Catholic movies have been made compared to the vast amounts of trashy or anti-Catholic movies? I can almost hear some of you asking what the Hays Code is and others ready to blame these problems on Vatican II.

Perhaps the answer to the above question comes in the form of other questions: What do you know about the Vatican Film List? When was the last time you sat through an exorcism movie? Wasn't that Brendan Gleeson movie about a small village priest in Ireland really well done?

Basically, there have always been hidden gems of Catholicism in movies around the world, even today. The fact that there are a bunch of great movies about Catholicism out there that most people don't really know about is something that should perk up all of you Catholic hipsters out there. Hidden, obscure, indie!? There's just something truly hipster about the best Catholic movies. While every other Christian person out there is watching another sequel to God's Not Dead or supporting other "Christian" movies with a VeggieTales level of theology, you could be scavenging the libraries and the interwebs to watch some truly great pieces of Catholic cinema, such as:

-I Confess (1953), a movie directed by Alfred Hitchcock about a priest who is falsely accused of murder and cannot break the Seal of the Confessional to claim his innocence.

-Deliver Us From Evil (2014), where Eric Bana plays a New York cop that partners with an exorcist priest to stop a crime with supernatural elements.

-Becket (1964), in which Richard Burton as St. Thomas Becket and Peter O'Toole as King Henry II go from friends to frenemies after Becket is made Archbishop of Canterbury.

-The Hoodlum Priest (1961), a B movie shot in St. Louis about a real life priest that ministered to and evangelized ex-convicts.

-Au Revoir Les Enfants (1987), a true to life French movie about two boys at a Catholic boarding school during World War II.

Now, when I talk about Catholic Movies, I mean movies that are positive portrayals of specifically Catholic subjects. Movies where priests or nuns are the main characters. Movies about the lives of saints. Movies that involves the Sacraments and exorcisms. Movies that are biblical and movies that are about recent events. These traits are the basic elements of what define a good Catholic movie.

I wasn't kidding about the library and the interwebs either. A lot of the best Catholic movies I've seen have been what I've found at my local library since they have a wide selection of DVDs to take home. Other times, I've had to search around Amazon or elsewhere on the internet to find that next special Catholic DVD. Occasionally you may come across a selection of DVDs at a Catholic supply store or at a conference or a relative may just give you one, but otherwise you're not going to have an easy time finding the truly great Catholic movies in major retail stores. You gotta go on a hunt and find the diamonds in the rough. Yet, that's part of what makes being a hipster so worthwhile, isn't it?

Cool Saint

St. Genesius

I tried hard to find a saint that wasn't replicated from the book, but I think this saint's story is too applicable to the topic.

St. Genesius was an actor from the Roman Empire during the third and fourth centuries. Tradition tells us that he was pretty much just living a good ol' pagan life when one day he had a brilliant idea to impress his pagan master, Emperor Diocletian, by creating a parody play that mocked Christianity. Putting his acting to the test, St. Genesius found some Christians (who were laying low because of religious persecution, mind you) and pretended to be interested in receiving the Sacrament of Baptism. All to do research on it so he could properly mock it in his parody. Hhhmm, sounds like method acting to me...an ancient Roman version of Daniel Day Lewis perhaps?

Anywho, once he's got enough information, tradition says that St. Genesius cut ties with the Christians before actually receiving the Sacrament, grabbed his troupe, and put on the show in front of an audience, including Emperor Diocletian. Onstage, St. Genesius portrayed a sick man, receiving a baptism from a priest. Again, tradition says that right after the mock baptism, St. Genesius had a sudden conversion and he changed right there on the spot. This story kind of reminds me of stories like how Sir Alec Guinness converted after playing Father Brown in The Detective or how the actor who played Judas in The Passion of the Christ converted during the filming of that movie. There's just something about being in the spotlight and pondering God and faith in word and deed.

So, St. Genesius, during this performance, turned it from a parody into a testimony by proclaiming Jesus Christ as God and King. He even told Diocletian himself to repent and convert. This did not sit well with the emperor, who had St. Genesius put to death. Therefore, as tradition goes, St. Genesius received a baptism by blood through his martyrdom.

Forgotten Prayer

Prayer to St Genesius
Actor and Martyr

Holy St Genesius,
martyr for Christ,
by the grace of the Holy Spirit
through your acting
you came to discover
the truth of the Christian faith.
In your first profession of that faith
you were baptized through the shedding
of your blood,
offering your life for the praise and glory
of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Pray for those who dedicate their lives
to the theatrical and cinematic arts.
Like you may they find the presence
of the Lord in their work
and generously open their hearts
to his teaching,
living it in the midst of the challenges
and demands of their calling.

In this novena, I remember most especially…., commending him/her to your care.

Let us pray:
Eternal Father, in your love you call all men and women to come to know you and to share in your divine life. Through the intercession of your martyr, Genesius, who responded so generously to the grace of conversion, grant that the same grace may be given to those who as yet do not know you, and may be renewed in those who do. We ask this through Christ our Lord.
Amen.

Activity

Go to Google and search "Best Catholic Movies". Look through the various lists you and find the movies that are specifically Catholic Movies like the descriptions above. Spot the names of movies you'd never heard of before and look interesting to you. Check out the trailers on Youtube or read a quick synopsis on IMDB. Of those movies that interest you, pick 3 movies to watch at home. Buy them, rent them, stream them, do whatever you legally have to do in order to watch these particular 3 movies in the next month.

Sources:

http://www.catholic.org/saints/saint.php?saint_id=185

http://www.stgenesius.com/dedicatedmembers.html

Book Review: The Catholic Hipster Handbook

I received The Catholic Hipster Handbook as a Christmas gift in the year of our Lord 2017. After quickly reading it and feeling very passionate about the contents, I decided to share my thoughts and passion in the form of an extended review.

The book title pretty much explains what it's all about. It's focused on Catholic subjects, written by various practicing Catholics with a Catholic audience in mind. It emphasized the Hipster attitude and mentality, the desire to be outside of trends, to be highly attracted to vintage things, and to dig deeper into stuff that is obscure in mainstream pop culture contexts. And it was a Handbook in the sense that it covered a variety of ways on how to be a Catholic hipster and provides the reader with various prayers and activities to push them to become an even greater Catholic hipster than before.

Each chapter was written in this specific format:

1) Article on chapter topic

2) A Cool Saint (or Blessed) that connects to the topic

3) A Forgotten Prayer that connects to the Cool Saint (or Blessed)

4) An Activity that connects back to the topic

It's hard to say that each topic is divided up into "chapters". Each chapter felt more like a short article or a blog post written by the individual contributors. Even the occasional footnotes sometimes made it feel more like a research paper from college than an actual book.

With that being said though, each article is engaging, intriguing, and fun to read. The uniform format with which each article is written also gives the book more of a professional touch rather than just a potpourri of friends writing whatever they feel like contributing to a blog. And there was still enough individual approaches to that uniform style that allowed each contributor to stand out in their specific way and provide various amounts of information depending on the topic at hand.

It helped me to be familiar with some of the contributors beforehand through other forms of media, including Youtube (Steven Lewis), podcasts (Sarah Vabulas), radio (Anna Mitchell), and Twitter (Tommy Tighe). This foreknowledge provided me with a better understanding of the voice that the writers were using, allowing me to detect the humor and wit with which they wrote their articles. This understanding also clued me in to how I was supposed to receive the writings of the other contributors, taking them seriously overall while also understanding that there is humor and joy at work in the writing as well.

This book is a very quick read. Even after reading a couple bits at a time, putting it down to do something else, and then picking it up again, it only really took me a couple of days to finish the whole thing and it really could've taken one single day if I was less distracted. Majority of the articles are only about four pages long or so, and each article offers something intriguing to keep the reader interested.

If there was one downside to how fast of a read the book is, it's that I felt like I always rushed through the Forgotten Prayers too quickly, especially when it came to the longer prayers. Whether it was my own desire to bust through each topic as quickly as possible, the overall pace/flow of each article, or my inability to read the book in a prayerful manner, I just always felt like I did not pace myself correctly when it came to the Forgotten Prayers. The good news is that, being a book that I own, I have the ability to go back and re-read each prayer and personally take my time with any of them that I choose to.

The Activities portions of each article provided the most fun and simultaneously the most challenging elements of the book. Sometimes it was simple stuff like take a quiz or look up certain people and websites online. Sometimes they would spiritually dare the reader to begin doing something like go to Daily Mass or begin praying the Liturgy of the Hours.

Then there were surprises like recommending a pilgrimage to local shrines without driving there, reconnecting with people you disagree with to grow in mercy towards them, and practicing minor mortification and Ignatian prayer. There was never any activity that I objected to, just sometimes I would get caught off guard by things that I thought would be hard for me to do initially. Aside from the challenges, there's other fun recommendations for events and games to try with friends. I'm making it a goal to do each activity at some point during 2018.

This book has some potential to appeal to non-Catholic readers as well as the intended Catholic audience. I think non-Catholics can learn some truths about the Catholic faith/ culture from people who seriously practice it and live it out. I'm not saying a lot of non-Catholics are gonna understand or appreciate this book, but I don't think it's so narrow that it doesn't invite non-Catholics to the party. The witty writing and hipster sensibilities are the main elements that will engage non-Catholic readers.

Catholic readers, meanwhile, are given a book that is a step up from the usual How-to-Catholic books that cover the initial basics. This handbook not only reinforces good daily spiritual practices, but also challenges those of us who already strive every day to grow closer to God. That challenge comes through unique activities and events as well as further daily practices. I think this is one of the main reasons why I like this book so much. It mainly addresses those of us Catholics who are daily practicing the faith and looking for something to help us make further improvements as disciples of Jesus Christ.

Since this book not a beginner's level guide to reversion or conversion, it is able to assume that the intended audience already knows a lot of Catholic buzzwords and is probably already doing something for daily prayer and spiritual growth. Sure, it's not a deeply mystical tome heavy on theology and high falutin' scholarly language, but it doesn't have to be because there's other books for that. I find it refreshing to have a book that's in between the intro level and monastic level of understanding Catholicism that can also provide me with insights and challenges that are related to my current way of living and applicable to how and why I want to grow in my relationship with God.

Here's how much I recommend this book: I would give this handbook to every young adult Catholic I know and interact with. I wanna get a book club going on this thing! I wanna hear a talk or give a talk about this book! I wanna hear or do a podcast episode solely about this book! It provides a lot of good conversation material and spiritual things to reflect upon. It's definitely worth having in your personal library at home.

Valuable Movies: The Hoodlum Priest Movie Review

The cover and title that caught my attention

I'm a fan of my local library. It's a great place to access so many different mediums of learning and entertainment. Many of the movies and things I've talked about on here have come from what I find at the library. Just like at a movie store, when I look through the shelves of DVDs at the library, I have so many options of things to choose from. Some great classics, some crappy modern schlock, some hidden gems I'd never heard of before, and some B-movies that just should've never been made. I often feel like the bad choices outweigh the good choices in most instances, but maybe I just have too narrow of movie standards, and I do really appreciate when I find some great, great pieces of cinema.

Rambling aside (hopefully) I recently came across a movie in the Dramas genre, "The Hoodlum Priest". My Catholic Movie senses began tingling, yet I didn't recall hearing of it before. I quickly looked online. No real reviews for the movie, barely a word on Rotten Tomatoes, mainly just some newspaper-type articles about the history of the making of the movie as a cheap, true-to-life B movie. The actors weren't familiar names to me (though one of them, Keir Dullea, went on to star in "2001: A Space Odyssey") and this was one of the first directing gigs for Irvin Kershner, who everybody loves now because of "The Empire Strikes Back". Unsure about the quality of the movie, I eventually decided that I was going to check this movie out, whether it turned out to be great or terrible. The reasons being:

1) It's a movie with a Catholic subject.
2) It's a real life story about a priest whose passion was helping ex-convicts.
3) It was filmed on location in St. Louis

I also knew I wanted to write a review of  the movie after seeing it, to try to either get this movie more positive reviews and credibility as a good film or to steer people away from it if it turned out to be an abysmal waste of time. My ratings below should indicate how I felt after finally watching this movie.

Artistic Value (Rating: 4)

Let's start with a little surprise towards the beginning. After we see our main ex-con Billy Jackson, played by Keir Dullea, being released from prison, a friend of his takes him to a shady part of town. They are planning a robbery and the friend, Pio, leads Billy to a third guy. The way these three interact, you think this third guy is just some other criminal in town, one who is cool, streetwise, and critical like any other typical gangster you've seen in other movies. By the end of the scene though, the man changes his clothes and you realize that the guy the cons have been talking about doing a robbery with is the priest, Father Charles Dismas Clark, played by Don Murray. It's a confusing yet interesting entrance.

At first, it feels misleading. We spend enough time with Billy and Pio in the beginning, and I'm just waiting for the priest, you know, the main character of the movie, to show up. And then this third guy who I don't think is the priest shows up and I'm like "Give me the main character all ready!" when suddenly the movie's like "He's been here the whole time" and I'm like "WWWhhhhaaaaa???!!!". This scene has unexpected value though, other than just introducing characters to us in a unique manner. It provides some context to dialogue and scenes that appear later on in the movie, so that we better understand Father Clark's reasoning and motivations in this opening scene.

The script is also surprising, confusing, and unexpected. Some dialogue can make this movie feel dated or stuck in its own time period. There's lots of lingo and slang from late 1950s used by our main characters, and you'll often hear words like "square" being thrown around in a city gangster tone. Sure, it gives you an idea of what kind of background these characters come from, but at times it could feel like how the Brady Bunch kids would throw around "groovy" or "right on" in an attempt to be hip and cool with the current audience. Don Murray's accent as Father Clark also goes back and forth. Sometimes it's a little too thick, a little too gangster, a little too specific to a particular time and place. Other times he just sounds like a regular guy at any time.

Yet, like I hinted at before, there's some good things going on in the script too. It reveals information about different characters at the right time and place. It helps you understand our main character and his motivations well, along with understanding the theme of the movie without feeling like it's talking down to its audience. The actors all say their lines with conviction and purpose, so there's less melodrama and more real life happening on screen. There are also a few moments of silent interactions, where you see people engaging in conversation, but don't hear what they're saying, or they're observing a situation without saying anything. Yet, you still clearly understand what's going on by the body language and facial expressions on the actors' faces. I liked that.

The two lead actors, Don Murray and Keir Dullea, have fantastic performances. Keir Dullea especially impressed me since he had to go through a variety of emotions and had to handle more of the quieter dramatic moments than Don Murray. Yet, even when Murray's Father Clark had to get emotional or extreme, I never found it overblown or past the point of disbelief. It sounded like a man who was convicted of his way and caught up in the passion of the moment.

It's hard to examine this movie's story and its main character without comparing to or pondering other movie priests from around this time period. Classic Hollywood is known for some great movies with interesting priest characters, and this movie matches a lot of these other classics:

-"On the Waterfront": Karl Malden's Father Barry also goes to the seedy, grimy parts of town you don't expect to find a priest at, in order to find the lost sheep and help people who would otherwise be ignored by other Christian people. There's even a powerful monologue where the priest gives an impassioned speech about helping these men.

-"Angels with Dirty Faces": Pat O'Brien's Father Jerry also has a desire to help criminals and low lives around him. He knows how to speak truth to these gangsters in a way that they understand and make them think because he comes from the same background as the criminals. There's also a scene with a criminal facing death row.

-"Going My Way/ Bells of St. Mary's": Bing Crosby's Father O'Malley is also a charismatic, streetwise priest.

-"I Confess": Montgomery Clift's Father Logan also ends up in some courtroom drama and has a surprising background for a priest.

I've even seen comparisons to other priests in movies like "Boys Town", "Fighting Father Dunne", and other movies that I haven't seen yet. I mean, here in "Hoodlum Priest", you've got a streetwise priest who devotes himself to saving needy men in criminal circumstances and ends up having to go to court or aiding someone on death row. It's hard not to think of movies with similar circumstances and made around the same time period, or in a sense paved the way for this movie to be made.

Yet, Father Clark was also a real person, with a quirky personality and strange history. They bring that reality and history of the legitimate Father Clark to the screen as well, you can feel like this all stems from a real person, not just somebody written up for the screen. Of course, as we know with any movie based on a true story, the movie isn't 100% authentic in its retelling of history, but I think this one does a good job of blending reality with the positive traits found in previous priests and stories in other movies.

The aesthetic of the cinematography worked very well. The black and white film helped to emphasize the shadows and special light effects that honed in on important moments. Also, with it being about dark subject matter and filmed on location, the black and white punched up the realism and better connected with the themes. When it came to editing the movie though, there were lots of jump cuts where they set up a scene and immediately cut in the middle of the action. You're seeing the exact same location, except the position of the actor or the angle of the camera is just a little off, just different enough to notice that something changed at a time and place that should've stayed the same.

For a film set in St. Louis, this movie shows a lot of the dirty, grimy parts of town, even back in the day before Downtown really became infamous for crime and grime. It goes through a lot of rundown buildings, shady alleyways, and seedy venues. Sure, you see some nice courtrooms, the St. Louis Zoo, and shots of St. Louis University High School (SLUH for locals), but otherwise this isn't exactly an attractive advertisement for the city of St. Louis.

The best reason for why it is acceptable for them to film in so many bad parts of town (or at least, unattractive parts of town) is because the subject of the movie is about criminals and working with people in the city's underbelly. As far as what particular locations were used and how they look similar or different today, someone more familiar with the St. Louis city and region would be better able to identify all of that than myself. For me personally, there wasn't much that helped me identify it as specifically St. Louis, but maybe that's because I'm not all that familiar with downtown architecture and history and such.

Like I mentioned before, there's plenty of scenes with some really great acting and there's some suspenseful scenes. There's a moment of great tension where Billy takes part in a crime. At first, it's just Billy and his friend Pio working on breaking into a small business vault. There's no music, just lots of shots establishing the scene and space. Suddenly, we start cutting back and forth between a truck pulling into the business and Billy slowly realizing that one of the bosses has returned to work. It's just several minutes of visuals without any background music or even much sound except for the tools used in the robbery. You know that something dramatic is going to happen and you know it's not going to be good, so you're just waiting for chaos to come crashing down and when it finally happens it's so worth it. This even leads to another fantastic scene filled with tension and terrific acting where you can see the aftereffects of the robbery scene have very deep psychological and emotional impacts on our leading characters.

Moral Value (Rating: 4)

The major theme of this movie revolves around Father Clark's desire to aid ex-convicts. His dedication to help people transition from criminal to moral citizen is inspirational to see and cunning in design. It's one part relationship-building, another part social justice, some tough love, and a dash of carefree rebellious attitude. In this movie, Father Clark really lives out Christ's call to visit the imprisoned and help the least of His brothers. We see Father Clark going into the jail and build relationships with the men inside. We see him provide people with means of escape from an impoverished life to one that provides better opportunity and rises above crime. We even see him pound the pavement for awhile just to get a guy a job.

Sometimes the testament that someone is living a Christ-like life is seeing good people cringe and think the worst of the intentions of the do-gooder-in-question. Just as the Scribes and Pharisees thought the worst about Jesus interacting with the tax collectors and prostitutes, good Christian citizens of St. Louis in this moviedon't seem to think it's good for Father Clark to engage with ex-cons. However, Father Clark brings up some good points and reasons for why he does what he does. How else are the ex-cons going to turn away from a life of sin and choose to do good? How can they do that without someone who provides resources and, perhaps more importantly, believes that they have what it takes to be more than just a common criminal?

One of the few downsides to this movie's morality stems from people who are antagonistic without much character growth. One such example is a newspaper man named McHale who is a journalist for the Times-Herald newspaper (which doesn't exist anymore fyi). He is continually trying to find ways to ruin Father Clark's plans and his life. The journalist thinks there's ulterior motives involved in Father Clark's actions. He thinks because Father Clark spends so much time with the criminals that there is something criminal about the Hoodlum Priest too (McHale is even the one that gave Father Clark that nickname).

The shame is that there is no resolution to this issue. There comes a point in a court room scene where Father Clark makes a passionate, almost confrontational, statement, aimed in part at the journalist, but that's the last that we see of the journalist and that's almost halfway through the movie. It would've been nice to see if the journalist changed his attitude towards the priest or if he remained an antagonist throughout the rest of the movie, provided there was good reason.

The other main antagonist in this movie is Mario, one of Billy's new bosses. Right from the get-go, Mario has a strong dislike and prejudice against Billy because of his past time in prison. The two never really get to know each other and whenever Mario gets a chance to vent his anger or display his strength against Billy, he takes it. At least this part of the story has a resolution, and it impacts the rest of the actions in the movie.

There are several times in this movie when characters talk with Father Clark about Saint Dismas, the thief hung on a cross next to Jesus in the crucifixion, who repented at the end. They continually connect St. Dismas with the title "good thief", constantly connecting the fact that the man had been a criminal but turned from his sinful ways in the end. The priest even goes so far as to use the story of St. Dismas as inspiration for a man who is on death row, in order to give him hope and even possibly a conversion experience at the end. I like that this man and his conversion story is used to relate to the situations the characters are going through, even if sometimes it feels like it's brought up more out of desire for the movie to sound more dramatic rather than just naturally stemming from character interactions.

I can see where some people may see this movie as preachy. It gets pretty focused on the death penalty near the end and there's a lot focus on social justice throughout the picture. It also talks about bringing dignity to men who may lack it because of their involvement in the prison system. However, if the acting was off or if it really felt like the movie was hitting the audience over the head with its themes, then maybe I can see the moral value of this movie being diminished. However, I find it all warranted based on how the audience connects to the characters and how much the story depends on the characters' connections to the themes. It's a good story that even has some relevance to today's audience.

Overall Value Rating: 4/5

As you might be able to tell, I was very satisfied with my viewing of "The Hoodlum Priest". I suggest finding it wherever you can check it out. I think it deserves more recognition and should be viewed by a wider audience. However, with that said, the fact that it is a relatively unknown movie and that there's more information online about the history of it rather than actual film criticism of the movie gives me some pause.

I wonder if I enjoyed this movie as much as I did because I have a personal connection to the region  or if it is because of my Catholicism. I wonder if someone who isn't from around St. Louis or who isn't Catholic/ religious would enjoy this movie as much as I did. Does the movie stand on its own or does it need some personal attachment in order for it to work? Sure, you can tell it's low budget, but for as quick as it was made, the fact that it was put together by a group of newbies and veterans in the movie business, and also with the understanding that it was set in a real place and about a real person, it makes up for most of its defects with lots of charm and passion.

This movie got me thinking about other movies I've seen, especially Catholic movies, and how much I appreciate when the people and philosophies of the faith are done well, as well as when things don't always get produced well. I really think this movie deserves more recognition and should be viewed by more people than just random film connoisseurs and the viewership demographic of TCM.



Sources for photos (all credit and rights to the rightful owners):

Wikipedia
The New York Times
The Riverfront Times