Boondock Saints is NOT a Good, Catholic Movie

Writer's Note: This article was originally written and developed in late July/ early August 2017. It was put together before an article was written in the Denver Catholic about how this movie became a part of the conversion experience for future FOCUS missionaries. You can read the article here. Point being that despite how the movie was used in this particular couple's story, it was not the source from which the couple came to know and grow in their faith and therefore despite its influence in this particular situation, my overall opinion of the movie remains the same. And here's why.

I have a passionate love for watching and talking about movies. Being Catholic, I also love movies that involve Catholicism, to show our faith in a positive light and to get people to think about the spiritual realities of our world. Now there are good movies, bad movies, Catholic movies, anti-Catholic/ anti-Christian movies. There are good Catholic movies, but then there are the bad Catholic movies, not in the sense that you are a bad Catholic if you watch them, but that these movies do a very very bad job of demonstrating the Catholic theology, faith, and way of life while maintaining a spotlight on Catholicism.

On the social media pages such as Facebook, you may occasionally see a list involving Catholic movies. Sometimes, on the Catholic Geek Facebook pages, there is discussion on Catholic movies and what people think are good Catholic movies worth recommending. Now, because movies are a subjective art where the overall quality and definition of "good" is based on the opinion of each individual person, there's different takes on what good Catholic movies are. However, I'm getting a little tired of seeing "Boondock Saints" named as a good Catholic movie by good Catholic people on these pages, so I'm here to explain why it is neither a good movie nor a Catholic movie.

For those who haven't seen the movie before, the basic synopsis is: Two Catholic Irish-American brothers, Conner and Murphy McManus (Sean Patrick Flanery and Norman Reedus respectively), decide to kill the mobsters and bad guys in Boston. The entire time, they're pursued by FBI special agent Paul Smecker (Willem Dafoe).

Full disclosure: I first saw this movie when I was 18 and barely living my faith. At that time, I thought it was a great, enjoyable action movie. However, over the years as my taste in movies has changed and my dedication to my faith has dramatically increased, I've come to see the many strange flaws of this movie. Also, fair warning, this is going to involve some spoilers and some salty sarcasm in the criticisms so...just so you know.

Let's begin our examination of what makes this a bad Catholic movie by focusing on the "Catholic" elements of this movie.

The Opening Scene/ Mass

Right off the bat, we're introduced to a bad showing of Catholicism. After words establish our setting onscreen (Boston, St. Patrick's Day), we hear ominous sounding Gregorian Chant inside a Catholic Church. Based on this intro, you'd almost think this was the beginning of "Spotlight" or "Doubt" or some other movie about the EVILS of Catholicism today.

We open up this scene with a priest in vestments and with people in the pews, so we can assume this is a Daily Mass, hopefully one celebrating the feast of St. Patrick. However, this priest character is dressed mostly in Lenten purple vestments, but with a green stole (the scarf-looking cloth). Is it cause it's St. Patrick's Day?

The priest is leading the people in the Lord's Prayer from an ambo that is placed in the center aisle of the Church, right in front of the steps leading to the altar. Poor Church design maybe, but at least they're doing the Lord's Prayer so we're almost ready for Communion...right? Well, Purple Priest ends with "For thine is the kingdom, the power, and the glory, now and forever" without the extra priest's prayer we're used to at Mass, so that's bizarre. Then, another priest, apparently the Monsignor of this parish, who is dressed in all white vestments, steps up to speak while Purple Priest takes a seat. Monsignor thanks Purple Priest for being their "guest speaker". Is this a Mass or not?!

The brothers, who have been in the pews this whole time, eventually walk up to the altar during Monsignor's talk without anyone stopping them or reacting like this is the craziest thing they've ever seen, except for Purple Priest, who apparently realizes how unorthodox the whole thing is, but a third priest, who is in white vestments but with a purple stole (What?!) stops him from stopping the brothers.

The one shining moment in this scene is when the brothers end up kissing the feet of Christ on the Crucifix. A noble gesture of holiness, perhaps? Usually when someone does so, it is out of recognition for the sacrifice of our Lord and how we love Him because of how He loved us. It is a beautiful sign to be sure, one that I often considered replicating during my undergrad days because we had a very similarly large wooden crucifix on the wall behind the altar. However, they quickly move away and EXIT THE CHURCH while the Monsignor is still talking. I'm guessing there's no Eucharist at whatever this thing is, and who knows if the brothers would've received the Sacrament had it been available.

Monsignor's talk (I really don't know whether to call it a homily or a sermon because I CAN'T TELL IF THIS IS A MASS!) begins "I'm reminded on this holy day (St. Patrick's Day)" before going into a spiel about a woman being murdered and nobody doing anything about it. Because, when we think of St. Patrick, who broke free from slavery and evangelized an entire island of pagans, we think of the bystander effect when a crowd of people witnesses a murder. Monsignor also says "We all must fear evil men", which he should realize is a total crap statement because Christ himself said "Fear ye not them that kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul" (Matthew 10:28, Douay-Rheims translation) .

Fun fact: According to IMDB Trivia, the church building used for filming this scene is actually Protestant since none of the Catholic churches would allow filming of a movie that they objected to.

Nuns

Within the first twenty minutes of the movie, we come across three nuns in full habit sitting in the hospital. They are a puzzling sight, because they appear to be worn out and possibly injured, with specks of blood sprinkled across their face and their habits. They are there with literally no back story or reason. What are they doing? Are they involved with the brothers, who happen to be in the same hallway? Do they work with the hospital or are they there being treated? We don't know, and they're only onscreen for like one minute overall! I'm guessing the movie is trying to infer that they're there because it's a Catholic hospital, which is only a guess based on the fact that a character dips his fingers in a font of holy water and does the sign of the Cross when he enters the hospital. An even better guess is that these nuns are there for literally no reason other than comic relief, because of course it's funny when some profanity is shouted around the nuns!

Get it?! Cause profanity is funny and nuns are super uptight!

The silliest part is that their reactions are the dullest things in this movie since they have the most bored expressions on their faces the entire time. And we don't even hear these ladies speak! This is all that we see from the only full habit nuns in this movie.

The Rosary 

In that first scene of the movie, we're introduced to the brothers kneeling in their pew. They appear to be praying the Rosary from the Rosary beads...that are hanging from their neck?! These Rosaries are treated like identification accessories, giving the brothers an image that perhaps helps the audience visually realize the Catholic religiosity of the brothers. However, their Rosaries don't even have Crucifixes! They're just Celtic crosses...cause ya know...the McManus brothers are Irish! And we never see them praying the Rosary at any other point of the movie. To me, the biggest issue of including the Rosary in this movie is that it made it seem like a good idea to actually wear the Rosary around the neck. I admit to having done so with mine during my early college years, until one of the older Catholic men in our friends group pointed out how dumb that was. Ultimately, the Rosary is not a necklace, an accessory, but rather it's a powerful tool and weapon for us to use in spiritual warfare, not to be fashionable.

The Confession Scene

Another argument for what makes this a "Catholic" movie is a scene that takes place in a confessional. Keep in mind for this entire scene, two guns are put at people's heads and there are multiple expletives. First, the priest, who at least is wearing all of the valid priest's attire for this moment as far as we can tell, did not start with the sign of the Cross or "In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit".

Smecker is seeking counsel and advice in the confessional, and the priest automatically assumes the man is not religious even though he never said anything like that. Smecker says he came to the confessional because of "ethics", so at least the script is acknowledging the Church is a place of certain ethical standards and even non-Catholics are aware of those standards. Smecker points out that the brothers doing all of their executions  as if they have God's permission, to which the priest rightfully begins to object that God doesn't justify straight up murder, but is shut up by a gun.

"Killing people is wrong." "I'll kill you for saying that, dude!"

The priest says a soul is what gives us feelings, like a conduit through which the Lord speaks to us (that's prayer, buddy boy! Didn't you learn anything in seminary?). The priest does try to do some evangelizing by brainstorming what God is doing through Smecker by bringing him into the church that morning. "It's easy to be sarcastic about religion", the priest says, giving us a glimmer of hope that this movie can at last shed some positive light on religion The priest is allowed to go on a roll with his evangelizing words. Smecker says "I want to stand for what I believe in", to which the priest replies, "First you have to know what your beliefs are" and then later "The laws of God are higher than the laws of man".

While still problematic, this scene ended up being a lot better during my rewatch than I remembered from the old days. That is, until the weird exit where Smecker begins to make the sign of the Cross but then makes an "Ah, forget about it" face, stops, and leaves awkwardly, letting us know that he's not really converted or at least not ready to go deeper in Catholic theology. Once Smecker leaves and the guns are put away, Rocco, our non-religious moral compass, then throws a little poor Latin ("dominus ominus") to the priest and furthermore tells the priest that he cannot break the seal of the confessional by telling anyone what went down just now.

Scripture Verses

There are a few moments sprinkled in the movie where the character Il Duce narrates, in an attempt to sound cool and give the movie thematic justification. Only half of the narration provided by Il Duce, which is supposed to sound Bible-based, is actually from Scripture. The rest, like Tarantino's Ezekiel 25:17 in Pulp Fiction, is made up crap. The narration utilizes Scripture-esque quotes mainly for the audiences' benefit to know the POV of our main characters and their justification for why they do what they do.

The first words of narration we hear come from Deuteronomy 32 (Verse 41). The script uses these words: "When I raise my flashing sword, and my hand takes hold on judgment, I will take vengeance upon mine enemies, and I will repay those who hate me. Oh, Lord, raise me to Thy right hand and count me among Thy saints"

Later, when they are spending the night in the police holding cell, the brothers are both woken in the middle of the night by Monsignor's little talk in the first scene before we hear the narration add in a little Genesis 9 (Verse 6) on us: "Whosoever shed man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed. For in the image of God made He man".

The most confusing thing about these quotes is not knowing which translation they're supposed to be based on. Overall, this feels too much like taking Scripture out of context in order to uphold one's slanted POV.

Prayer

There's a "prayer" that the brothers say, just as they are about to execute their enemies. Basically, it's a prayer where the boys pretend to be the soldiers of God, doing God's will, in order to justify their killings. This is one of the most memorable quotes from the movie, one that I think some Catholics admire as a positive takeaway from the movie. The most Catholic thing I took away from this prayer was the Latin words used for the Holy Trinity. Other than the opening scene and the occasional sign of the Cross, the times they "pray" this prayer are the only moments when we see the brothers do any praying. However, there's a difference between being in battle and praying to God for strength, victory, and protection, and then praying that you're pleasing God by purposefully executing people without giving them a chance for repentance, justice, or mercy.

The Courtroom Climax

At the end of the movie, the brothers, newly reunited with their father, burst into a courtroom to publicly execute the movie's villain, the Italian mafia boss. They intentionally make a ruckus because they're trying to make a public statement to everyone about their purpose and existence. You'd think, as Catholic men, they'd be doing a little evangelizing and spreading some Catholic theology along the way. However, their statement is so terribly un-Catholic and so weird, that I have to break down the worst parts, CinemaSins style.

-"We do not ask for your poor or your hungry." "We do not want your tired and your sick": These are literally the types of people that Christ calls us to help! You're saying you're intentionally ignoring the neediest people. Sure, everyone is called to give aid in different ways depending on their abilities (one body, many parts, all that good stuff), but everyone is STILL called to focus especially on the poor, the hungry, the destitute, the people who are in most need. So you are publicly stating you're intentionally defying our Lord's command?

-"Do not kill. Do not rape. Do not steal. These are things that every man of every faith can embrace.": Um, I think history has shown that certain men of certain faiths do not wholly embrace your little philosophies there. Don't act like you fully encapsulated the Ten Commandments just in those three "Do nots" either. Also, you're literally about to kill somebody, so how are you embracing that first statement again?

-"We urge you lesser forms of filth, not to push the bounds and cross over into true corruption": Translation-We're okay if you sin and choose to do bad things, just make sure it's none of the really bad stuff that gets you put in jail or mistreats other people. Also, what is true corruption? Is any human being truly corrupt? Ultimately a true Catholic would say "Go and sin no more!" and that's it.

-"And we will send you to whatever god you wish": According to the Catholic Church, there is only one God who judges a person to Heaven or Hell. Different people of different faiths don't get to choose their own afterlife experience in the end. Unless you're trying to succinctly say that bad guys see Satan as their god and therefore would wish to go to Hell with Satan, which I'm sure you're not, this statement makes no theological sense in the Catholic tradition.

The "Saints"

Do these guys look that saintly to you right now?!

The brothers Conner and Murphy McManus, our protagonists, are supposed to play the role of the good Catholic boys, the "Saints". Here's a list of all the "saintly" things we see the brothers do in this movie:

-Our first intro to the brothers outside of the church? Slapping each other with the meat products they work with at a factory and punching a feminazi after she kicks one in the balls.

-They tie a guy down to a bar counter and literally set the guy's buttocks on fire!

-Murphy takes a cup of water or coffee in his hand and playfully splashes the policemen he is hanging out with. We hear him say "Body of Christ" while he is doing so, which makes it hard to tell if he is mocking Baptism or the Eucharist (or both?).

-They make the sign of the Cross before going into action killing the Russian mobsters. Later, Conner makes the sign of the Cross over the body of a dead man that he just murdered.

-The brothers, who by all accounts in this movie live in poverty, don't appear to have any qualms with taking the dirty money lying around in the same room where they killed all the Russian mob bosses. This isn't played off as a Robin Hood moment, but rather a moment of greed.

-They don't care that their best friend, Rocco, works for the mafia and are willing to threaten this friend's life just for their own amusement.

-They have no problem taking the Lord's name in vain with JCs and OMGs and such.

-They also have no qualms with Rocco not only "dating" a woman addicted to drugs, but then verbally abusing her and threatening her with a gun.

But it's all okay because they have the silhouette of the Blessed Virgin tattooed on their necks!

Pennies

My last note involving Catholic Christian theology is based on currency and death. Some of the most iconic imagery in this movie involves the brothers putting pennies over the eyes of the men that they kill. The pennies over the eyes of the dead are seen as having a "religious" connotation. However, I have a question: Where is that idea in Christian theology!? Smecker explains it in terms of Greek or Roman mythology, and maybe the movie is trying to connect Celtic paganism to our Irish Catholic boys, but how are these ideas connected?


Well, that was fun. Now, someone may be saying: Well, even if it's not really Catholic movie, I still think it's a good movie...isn't still a good movie? Let's consider the following:

Questioning the Movie's Realism and Quality

-How confusingly meta is this movie? The actor David Della Rocco plays a mafia runner named...David Della Rocco.

-A character with tourettes and a speech impediment? I'm sure he's here for good character development and not profane comic relief.

-How could anybody just randomly walk into a police precinct unannounced and unchaperoned? And dudes can just randomly walk back in the holding cells without being checked in or stopped or anything?

-How can anybody carry a toilet up onto a roof and climb on top of unstable barrels without falling off the building?

-Signs that it's a good movie? Ron Jeremy plays a supporting character in the Italian mafia.

-How did they know where to find the shady guy with a bunker full of guns?

-Somehow in a scuffle in the air vents, which isn't heard by the mobsters below for some reason, the boys conveniently make the rope, which was tied around their bodies, extend and caught on their ankles so that they can dangle upside down in the room. Not only are they upside down, but they are expertly shooting these bad guys with lethal precision. Have these guys used guns before? Have they killed people before? Were they trained by anything other than movies and TV? I don't know!

-How did Smecker make it into the confessional without being seen by or even seeing the brothers, who we see are praying in the back of church in full view of the confessional?

-Why isn't Rocco in terrible terrible pain the day after his own finger is shot off?

-Why was the straight, horny mafia guy so aroused by Willem Dafoe, who was clearly a crossdresser?

-When it was revealed that Il Duce was the father of the brothers (oops, sorry...major spoilers, I guess), why wasn't there some big discussion or argument? As soon as Il Duce joined in their prayer, the boys automatically accepted the man without any hesitation, despite the fact that they tried to kill each other in a previous shootout.

Further Considerations and Faults

It isn't until the first time that the brothers go on mission to execute mobsters that one of the main themes of this movie is examined, so we learn this info after the first third of the movie. "Boondock Saints" is supposed to be a commentary on cliches and stylized moments in action movies and TV shows. There's references to Charles Bronson, Rambo, and what the brothers see on TV. But we never even see a TV in the Saints' apartment and there's never a moment beforehand where they watch anything or comment on TV until they get guns in their hands. The visual effects of this movie with the blood and the wounds are both low budget and exaggerated, making it possible that this is all just a commentary on other action movies that are cheap and exaggerated. Dafoe's character even breaks the fourth wall a bit with his line "Television is responsible for this. You see this in bad television", which is a little too wink wink nudge nudge for me. This theme gets picked up and dropped so much that it's hard to tell if this movie is trying to parody terrible action cliches or if it wants to be a role model for terrible action cliches.

The answer, as demonstrated by this image, is probably both.

Sometimes it feels like the brothers are almost given superhero type powers just because they're the protagonists. For example, they are capable of speaking Spanish, French, Gaelic, Italian, English, and Russian. They demonstrate these multi-language skills during their casual interrogation with Smecker. Amazed, Smecker asks "What are you guys doing working at a meat packing plant?" A legit question with a potentially interesting answer...but that gets shrugged off real quick and then interrupted by something silly. I want more backstory, darn it! You can't pose a decent question exploring character development and then just say "Nevermind! Let's get to the fun stuff!".

We also eventually learn that Willem Dafoe's character is homosexual, which no, that doesn't immediately make it a bad movie. What makes this character trait a poor choice is that his being homosexual is almost thrown in more for laughs than for good character development. There's also some quick moments where he's derogatory and rude towards other homosexual men, almost as if he himself hates being homosexual and tries to be different than them. I admit that I did feel discomfort when seeing two grown men naked in bed and one trying to cuddle on top of the other (there's an implication that they were sleeping together before we see what takes places on screen).

The Ron Jeremy bad guy patronizes a place called the Sin Bin, because OF COURSE HE DOES! This provides us with a lovely scene where he is inside a dark room, masturbating to porn where you can see the woman's nipples reflected in his glasses. And the real life stripper of the Sin Bin faints during the Saints' mission to execute Ron Jeremy, and just so happens to have one of her boobs slip out of the bikini top, so Rocco gets the chance to grope an unconscious woman. Yay!

It's okay though. He's funny and he promises to tip her, so he's a good guy after all!

Rocco and the brothers clarify that the brothers kill anyone "they" think is evil, to which Rocco's natural first reaction is that the whole thing is "a little weird, a little psycho". The brothers explain that their rationale is, because bad guys are doing bad things without consequences, that people everywhere are thinking that these bad guys deserve to be killed by somebody. They consider themselves that somebody. Somehow, based on that one paragraph, thirty second explanation, they change Rocco's mind on things. Not only that, but eventually these guys let Rocco, the immoral mafia package boy, be the moral compass who decides which bad guys deserve to die! Why? What's his moral standard? He willing works for the mafia and even objects to going to Church in the morning for prayer! There's no established morality to justify these killings and these three guys have no higher moral ground to stand on anyway!

After the climatic courtroom scene, the movies ends in a series of local news interviews with people on the streets. This is actually a pretty decent idea to present thematic dialogue, maybe the movie's best attempt to question its philosophical ideas. Are these brothers heroes? Are they doing good? Is it right or wrong? Does the media make it better or worse? These kinds of questions are examined from all sides and angles in quick snippets. It doesn't help the fact that this is the very end of the movie and these questions don't actually come from our main or supporting cast of characters, but just from random people who might as well be the random stranger sitting next to you in the movie theater.

Final Thoughts

There's plenty of other parts that are worth considering and nitpicking, but this article can't go on forever unfortunately. The point is that "Boondock Saints" does not present the Catholic faith well and, even forgiving the fact that this was made by a first time director, the quality of the final product is not good. This is the kind of movie that is made by a manchild with a very surface level understanding of Christianity and religion because he's more heavily influenced by secular relativism than faith itself. The R-rating of the movie is mainly due to the unnecessary constant F-bombs and for the over-the-top blood effects from all the gunplay. If I had to give this movie a rating based on my Artistic and Moral Value standards, it would probably be a 1 out of 5 at best.

We need to hold movies to a higher standard overall, but more importantly we need to hold movies about Catholicism to an even higher standard. I'll be happy if I keep "Boondock Saints" out of my DVD player for a long time to come, and I hope together we can find superior movies about Catholicism and guns and Rosaries and crazy Willem Dafoe acting!

To avoid ending this article with my unhumble opinion, I will leave you with quotes from total strangers. Here are a few quotes, about particular scenes in the movie, from a Youtube video called "Irish People Watch The Boondock Saints for the First Time".

-"I think they're just bad saints...cause you wouldn't just leave a church like that. They just left!" "Saints love Mass".

-"So much cursing...So much for Catholicism!"

-"So they bless them after they kill them? They wouldn't have to bless them if they didn't kill 'em".

Why I Suit Up for Mass

Today, I'd like to share with you why I put on a suit for Mass and why I think it's important to dress nice for Mass. I will go through my history of the clothing I chose for Mass, my steady growth towards putting the suit on, and then examining some reasoning behind what is going to cause people to be convinced to also dress up.

I'm mainly talking about Sunday versus the regular week. Sunday, Christians celebrate the Sabbath, so it's a special particular day of our week. If I go to Daily Mass during the week, I still try to look nice and wear some sort of collared shirt and nice pants. Generally, I stay away from shorts and the only time I don't wear a dressy shirt is when I'm dressed to go to work. At Daily Mass, some people are on their way to work like I am, and so our clothing choices are not too much of an issue.

Now, obviously I haven't dressed up my entire life of going to Mass. This is a development from over the past few years. In college, I would still sometimes go in shorts or jeans and every once in a while I would wear a long sleeved button down but for the most part I wore a polo. I got gussied up for a few special Masses but very rarely did I go full suit and tie combo

Even in grad school, I started feeling like I was wearing my work attire to Sunday Mass. Which was true, since at work I was dressing in a button down and nice pants and dress shoes, but at both work and Mass I had my sleeves rolled up and I didn't wear a suit jacket or a tie. I challenged myself to dress up for Sunday Mass for Lent a couple years ago and after that the habit continued so that every Sunday Mass I would take the time to tie a tie (sometimes in Creede I would wear my bowtie) and put on my suit jacket and do the full ensemble.

Why do I dress up for Mass? I mean, I understand some people argue that our Lord doesn't care what we dress like for Mass as long as we're there. Which in a sense, yeah sure. However, at the same time, we should care about how we dress up. Often times, we dress up for going to job interviews or attending weddings and funerals, or whenever there's just some special unique occasion, we get dressed up. However, the Mass IS a special occasion, even if it happens every week. It's in a special place too. I talked in my Hands for Prayer post how the Church isn't a store, the streets, or even your house that you walk around casually. This is a temple of the Lord! This is a place specially designed and reserved for prayer, for being closer to God, and for glorifying Him. And so, since the place we are in is special, our general attitude overall should be special and the minute details of how we dress should be special.

It shouldn't matter whether we're in a big city urban metropolis or if we're in a small rural country place. The problem is everywhere, just as the solution is applicable everywhere. Everywhere you go now, you'll basically see the same get-ups. The older guys will be in polos tucked into their jeans. The kids will be in t-shirts and gym shorts. All around, no matter where we are, there's still a need for dressing up for the Mass.

People that are fully cognizant of what they're choosing to wear, and having the presence of mind to know what their day's schedule will be, have the presence of mind to dress up for Mass. We're giving God a little extra special time and attention by making sure that we're wearing a nice shirt, that we tie our tie correctly, and we throw our suit jacket on whether it's 100 degrees outside or 10 degrees outside.

Some of my catalysts for changing the way I dress for Mass included reading the Catholic Gentleman's article on dressing up for Mass. Also, after moving out to St. Paul, I started going to Mass the same time as my aunt and uncle, who live near us, and I saw my uncle dress every week in a nice button down shirt, with sleeves rolled down and cuffed, and in a tie. Every week. That inspired me to at least start going in at that same level and continuing my habit and growth from there.

Being suited up tells the people who see me and are around me at Mass that I care enough about coming to Mass, and I care enough about our God, that I will get up and I will get myself dressed a little extra special compared to my normal look so that I can glorify Him. I can mark how special this place called church is. I'm of the mindset that we should care about how we look. If we're going to treat all of these other special events as being reason enough or worthy enough to dress up for, this should be THE event that we should get dressed up for.

Now comes the point where I start trying to guess what people's reactions or questions to this post would be. So, naturally, someone is going to point out that as a young single man, my thoughts cannot probably apply to parents with kids. True, I cannot fully speak for parents trying to dress their kids. I know sometimes it's a struggle to get kids to dress up or sometimes there's events like sports or family gatherings that are going on before or after Mass that people have to rush to or from on Sundays. I'm not necessarily speaking on that, though my only point to make is that ultimately parents have control over what their children wear so there you go.

Another objection I can hear from people is: What about the people who can't afford to buy a suit to wear to Mass? Hypothetically, if you're asking that question to me, you're asking a man who has purchased most of his button down shirts and dress pants from Goodwill, so you're not asking someone who has had the ability to buy multiple suits worth triple digits each. Shoot, Americans in the past couple hundred years were able to buy, make, and wear their 'Sunday best' clothes, and most everyone today is generally richer than those people were. So, my reasoning is that most Mass attendees have the means to buy nice clothes for Mass. It doesn't have to be fancy or made from the finest fabrics and cost you a fortune to be worth wearing. If it's a step up from your normal attire and it shows you took special time and effort and it looks like something you'd wear to other special, fancy occasions, then you're good.

So what's the next step? What's it gonna take to inspire more people to dress up? Some people have probably seen this sarcastic joke in their church bulletin: An ad saying the parish doesn't have a pool or a beach before explaining why casual wear like shorts and tank tops are not good clothes to wear to Mass. I've seen both positive and negative reactions to this, where some people appreciate the joke because they agree with the ultimate message but other people see how critical the message is and they respond to the sarcasm with cynicism. Ultimately, the ad is basically preaching to the choir, where the only people who appreciate it are the people who agree with the message.

I'm not here to preach to the choir, I'm here to inspire people who don't dress up at the moment. This problem here is correlated to the overall problem of how devoted people are to the Mass, the Eucharist, and the Sacraments. I'm willing to bet that the kind of people that appreciated the above mentioned bulletin ad are also the people who actually do dress up in part because they are also trying to increase their devotion to the Mass and the Church. I'm willing to bet a lot of people that you see dressed up in the pews on Sunday are also the people that are creating their weekday schedules not just on work and responsibilities but also how they fit their prayers and spiritual development into their work week. None of this is to say that the dude in flip flops and bro tank on Sunday is definitely slacking in his spiritual life. The point is that if we make the extra effort to emphasize the minute details such as how we dress for Sunday Mass, it will most likely reflect that we are making an extra effort in living out the minute details of the spiritual life outside of Sunday Mass. This is all just my opinion based on observation and experience, so take it or leave it as you will.

As I stated earlier, I didn't always dress nice when I went to Mass, but as I came to appreciate the importance and beauty of the Church and the Mass, I realized the way I dress can reflect that importance and beauty. It's all one part of the answer to the question: What can I do to give glory to God? I really do think that one way to inspire the people of the Church at large to become the strong faithful disciples we're all called to be is to take that extra few minutes each morning to pull out the nice shirt, tie that tie, and to put that suit jacket on!

Classic American Pictures with Mr. Deeds and Mr. Smith

The other day, I watched the great American classic "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" featuring the great Jimmy Stewart. The other month, I watched the underrated American comedy "Mr. Deeds Goes to Town" featuring the underrated Gary Cooper. On the surface, they seem like the same basic movie. At the beginning, an old man in a position of power has died. He is replaced by the main protagonist, who comes from a rural, simplistic little town and is being thrown into the big city life. The protagonist is being brought in by a corrupt group of men of power that try to take advantage of him and then, through legal and judicial means, try to frame him for criminal activity when he is actually innocent. People in the city take advantage of him and tease him for his naive, simplistic ways of living and thinking. Both movies even have the exact same love interest, a city slicker tough girl who at first is a pawn of the corrupt group and who thinks low of the protagonist but over time begins to fall in love with him due to his genuine kindness and honesty. Through her character development and by a confession of love for him, she helps him overcome obstacles in the end. Both movies are even directed by the same man, Frank Capra. And even stranger, "Mr. Smith" was, according to IMDB, originally supposed to be a sequel to "Mr. Deeds", kind of like how "The Bells of St. Mary's" was a sequel to "Going My Way".

I don't know if I would've directly noticed that they were the exact same movie if the female protagonist/ love interest wasn't the exact same, down to the same actress in both movies. Jean Arthur is an attractive blonde and everything, but the voice kinda throws me off at first because it's got that cliche 20s, almost gangster talk, manner of speech.

Yeah see, I knew that dame, that broad, that dollface looked familiar, see!

It's only through her engagement with the characters where she shows her wit and charm that kind of wins me over. It's not necessarily a problem to have the actress play similar characters in both movies because her performances and characters only add value to the movie, but it just kinda throws me off when I'm in the middle of a movie I'm watching for the first time and I'm thinking to myself "It feels like I've already seen this before".

So what's the difference, you may be asking if you've never seen both movies. Well, in "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington", Jeffrey Smith (Jimmy Stewart) replaces a U.S. Senator and is in Washington D.C. fighting a corrupt business tycoon from his state along with a mentor, who is a puppet of the tycoon. I'm not giving anything away that isn't basically spelled out for you in the first ten minutes of the movie. In "Mr. Deeds Goes to Town", Longfellow Deeds (Gary Cooper) replaces a distantly related rich uncle from New York City and is fighting a greedy group of lawyers along with other distant family members. Senator Smith, who has never been in politics before and is known for being the leader of a Boy Scout type group, is accused of criminal action within the senate and is deemed unfit for his post. Mr. Deeds, who has never been in the upper class and is known for being a quirky jack of all trades, is accused of wasting his inheritance and is deemed fit for the looney bin.

Though I ask you, is this the face of a crazy man to you?

Both movies have great acting with great characters. Both men are actually sensible and intelligent in their own unusual way, often outmaneuvering the schemes of their enemies. "Mr. Deeds" is a much funnier movie. I remember several moments of honest laughter bursting out of me while watching it. However, "Mr. Smith" is much better remembered. I think the reasons why "Mr. Smith" is remembered more often than "Mr. Deeds" are because Jimmy Stewart is a popular figure in American cinema and today is a much more well known actor from that era compared to Gary Cooper and also the political connections in "Mr. Smith" keep the themes and ideas much more relevant to what we're going through today.

Mr. Deeds is a much more interesting character than Senator Smith. We see Mr. Deeds act quirky, we see him play the tuba, create his own poetry, and he just comes from a quirky place that we come to know and appreciate while watching the movie unfold. Mr. Deeds is a confident man's man while Senator Smith is often overwhelmed by his surroundings, and at first his only redeeming quality seems to be that he's idolized by the boys of his group. We're told a lot about Jeff Smith, but we don't even know exactly what town or state he hails from. We're told he likes nature and he can quote all of these presidents (for whatever reason he never quotes Teddy Roosevelt which I think would've been very fitting for this character). He talks about nature here and there, but for the most part all we really see of Senator Smith that really stands out is his admiration and appreciation for all the political monuments in Washington D.C., particularly the Lincoln memorial. We never hear him quote any of the presidents or say lines from any of the big American political documents except for when he reads the Constitution during the filibuster.

I say, my fine fellows, this appears to be the basis of modern laws and democracy. Let's debate it for the next several centuries, shall we?

What I find interesting, as far as what makes these movies powerful viewing for today, is their examination of corruption versus genuineness and honesty and what the movies and I would call American values. The protagonist in both cases is a very naive person with an ideal perception of America based on where he comes from. When he comes to the big city for the first time, this is his first experience of seeing how things can get twisted and lost and corrupted and how maybe not everywhere is living out those values and ideals. It just means that he has never really experienced it before, and all these people in the big cities are making fun of him for something he doesn't really know or understand at first for thinking the ideals can stand in that city environment. Both protagonists prove those values CAN exist in those environments through genuine honesty and community.

Community is of great importance in both films. The only reason the antagonists are able to be powerful and corrupt is because they built their own little system of corruption and rely on each other to stay in power. Compare that to the protagonists, who at first are alone and getting beaten down, but through their own genuineness and their struggles, they win over the people in order to build a strong support from the everyday, average people. The common man is important to both movies because it keeps the ideals and the characters grounded, especially when comparing it to the high society greeds and desires of the lawyers, senators, and tycoons who see themselves as better than everyone else.

Stop acting high and mighty, peasants! Don't you know money is the most important thing in this world!?

What I don't quite understand is in "Mr. Smith", the main antagonist Mr. Taylor is a very materialistic man and he's trying to win over Jeff Smith through material things and positions of power. Smith doesn't go to his side, but I wonder what is exactly holding him back. The movie really pushes and emphasizes the American values as his moral compass that keeps him from joining Taylor, but I wonder how Christianity plays a part in that. A lot of the values and ideals in America, both when it was first founded and during the time of the movie, were built on Christian values. Christ calls us to not be focused on the material, earthly things but to focused on the spiritual, heavenly things and those Christian values don't seem to keep Mr. Smith, or even Mr. Deeds, from being corrupted by the antagonists. The movies just accept that the characters were raised on common sense and traditional American values and that's all they need. Mr. Deeds seems to live out more Christian values compared to Senator Smith by using his inheritance late in the movie to help the poor and set up systems to give his money away, which causes conflict near the end.

On the surface, both films seem like classic, overly patriotic pictures. The protagonists have such strong American ideals, visit all of these monument,s and look back on all of these great historical men, who helped found and define this country, with deep reverence and awe. It's almost blowing the American trumpet too hard...on the surface.

Oh, I'm sorry Mr. Deeds. I meant to say blowing the American tuba.

At a certain point in "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington", where he questions whether the classic American values still exist or not, Senator Smith points out that if he quit his post instead of fight the corrupt machine, that he would have to tell all his boys and the people back home that these values he loves so much are what he would call "hooey" or what I would call "a bunch of crap". That's kind of how we, the 21st century cynical pop culture audience, view these American values when looking at these types of American movies from the perch of our present day and age. Back then, there might not've been as much cynicism towards the values and patriotism, but now we look back on these movies and we look at our own situation and laugh a little bit that those American values are gone now. I think though that because of the genuineness of the characters and because of their appreciation for what the founding fathers thought and did and how those values translated over time to apply to their own situation, we can still take the characters' appreciation for those values and apply it to our own situation and see that maybe those ideals aren't all the way gone. There's just been a continuation of corruption and improper use of power, continuing a need for true honesty and earnestness to live out those ideals.

I'm glad I sat down and have seen both movies. I'm only sorry that it took me so long to watch both. They are definitely fine examples of what made the golden age of Hollywood so stellar and excellent. Despite their similarities, they're different enough to make each story compelling and engaging. I obviously recommend that you too watch both movies as soon as you can. Even with some of my critiques and questions, I would still rank these as 4.5 out of 5 on my valuable movies ranking scale.

Music Series: Top 10 Arctic Monkeys Album Songs

In a seven year time span (2006-2013), the Arctic Monkeys released five studio albums. In the four years since the release of their fifth album, their grand total of studio albums is...still five. However, with other interests and involvement in other bands, these British musicians keep busy when they're not working on their commitments as the Band-Otherwise-Known-As-The-Deathramps.

As I may have explained before, I discovered the Arctic Monkeys, amongst others, by playing Guitar Hero. It was after hearing Brianstorm for the first time that I sought out the Arctic Monkeys discography at the stores and libraries, assuming that all of their songs would be of a similar rushing pace and banging sound. To my pleasant surprise, only their first album and a half is like that, with enough variation in their songs to make them interesting and lyrically magnetic.

This is the kind of band that I can stop listening to for months at a time and then suddenly pick back up obsessively. Even when I haven't listened to any of their albums for so long, I can still sing along to pretty much the entire of the Favourite Worst Nightmare or Humbug albums. The instruments are usually what attract me to a band at first, and their instrumental sounds range from new age punk to mellow lounge jazz, and the different effects that are chosen for the guitar to harmonize with the varying vocal range of Alex Turner reverberate in my ears constantly in a good way (I'm trying to sound way much more intelligent and academic than I really am here). The lyrics have, for the most part, centered on the various life issues of being a British suburban man, from the weirdness of teenage romance to the arrogance of celebrity, all the while triumphantly acknowledging the glitz and grit of the partying lifestyle most secular millenial men like Alex Turner and company come across.

In random celebration of the music of Arctic Monkeys, as well as just to give me something to write about, I will be giving you my Top 10 songs that I most enjoy from their studio albums (the choice of album songs is a distinction that I will clarify in another post). My choice in songs is based on what I consider the best of the best from each of their albums, from the most popular songs to my personal favorites, all the while attempting to showcase the variety in pace and tone you find in Arctic Monkeys discography.

For what it's worth, on the record, my take on ranking their albums overall is:

5. AM (2013)
4. Suck It and See (2011)
3. Whatever People Say I Am, That's What I'm Not (2006)
2. Favourite Worst Nightmare (2007)
1. Humbug (2009)

10. I Bet That You Look Good on the Dancefloor (WPSIA,TWIN)

What's to Like: Lightning fast basic guitar sounds on top of caveman drumming, all the while remaining well timed and held together by the lyrics flowing from Alex Turner with support from Matt Helders (the drummer) in the background. This is the kind of song that highlights what first attracted people to the Alex Turner's lyrics, expressing teenage horniness and dreamy excitement in a flat suburban setting.

Tune Out (a.k.a What's Not to Like): Nothing too weird to turn you away from the song, unless you don't like allusions to teenage lust or biting guitar riffs.

Best Lyric That Would Make a Great Painting: Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984

9. Don't Sit Down Cause I've Moved Your Chair (Suck It and See)

What's to Like: The dark echoey guitar that's somehow reminiscent of psychedelic rock from the late 60s, early 70s. This is one of the rougher, rockier sounding tunes from the Monkeys, but it's also counterbalanced by ridiculous, jokey lyrics and a slower pace. With references to the Macarena and whatever shell suits are, as well as some gritty technical effects on the instruments, you know you're in for a bizarrely entertaining time.

Tune Out: References to old wive's tales and the devil that you may take seriously if you don't know what you're getting yourself into. Also, if you're not a fan of grungy bass and guitar sounds, turn away now.

Top Lyric You'd Want to Try in Real Life: Kung fu fighting on your roller skates.

8. The View from the Afternoon (WPSIA,TWIN)

What's to Like: This is the first song on the first album, and it kicks things into high gear right from the start. The drums almost steal the show with how quick and hard they're being played, and their duel with the guitars gives you that punk-ish vibe that the Monkeys started out with. Alex Turner's voice is still being developed but that makes it all the more appropriate for a song that requires a gruffy sound that goes from high and low sounds.

Tune Out: If you didn't know this song was put together by a bunch of teenagers, you'd think this really was from a drunk guy who's dealing with issues at the bars and casinos that he's playing at.

Lyric Most Likely Describing Your Night Out: Anticipation has the habit to set you up/ for disappointing evening entertainment but/ tonight there'll be some love, tonight there'll be a ruckus

7. Dancing Shoes (WPSIA,TWIN)

What's to Like: The balance between the instruments in the background is groovy and makes you want to get to your feet automatically. The lyrics fade in and out and are only really beneficial to shape the frame of the story, about two young lovers falling in love to the beat of a nice groove. I especially like how this song jumps from funky to rock, and this is one of the earliest examples of an Arctic Monkeys song finishing on a fast loud hammering sound.

Tune Out: A teenager's idea of romance in a pop culture influenced suburban environment.

Top Backhanded Compliment Lyric: Get on your dancing shoes/ you sexy little swine

6. R U Mine (AM)

What's to Like: Very engaging buzzy guitars. It knows it's not a complex song for any of the instruments, but it rocks and rocks hard. Alex Turner throws in some fast, witty lyrics that showcases what he can do in a lower vocal range in a different kind of voice while still giving Matt Helders and Nick O'Malley (the bassist) the chance to showcase their falsettos. 

Tune Out: To me this song (and this entire album really) is just a showcase of the terrible attitude that comes from the non-commital clubbing and dating scene and pretends to be something deeper than what it really is,

Biggest Attempt at Being Poetic Lyric: She's a silver lining climbing on my desire

5. Crying Lightning (Humbug)

What's to Like: This song demonstrates how this album, Humbug, changed the Arctic Monkeys sound in a good way. The bass is featured prominent as it lays a medium level and groovy pace. The guitars have plenty of effects pedals going, but they're not intrusive and give the song a somber yet anticipatory sound. The drums balance well between the snare and the cymbal sounds, with some fun quick rolls thrown in. These lyrics are some of the most poetic, image-driven lines from Alex Turner that are directly about relationships and suburban life issues without sounding like it (i.e. they're not as direct as on their first album)

Tune Out: The strange thing is there aren't any lyrics or sounds that I would generally warn you away from, there's just something about the structure of the song that keeps me from considering it to be the best Arctic Monkeys song of all time.

Lyric You Most Want to Know the Backstory To: And how you like to aggravate the ice cream man on rainy afternoons

4. Cornerstone (Humbug)

What's to Like: Pleasant gentle guitars with flowing keyboard sounds in the background. The mellow vocals that bemoan a missing lover. It's a sweet song and tells a tragic yet engaging story. This showcases that the Arctic Monkeys can do slow stuff well when they really want to.

Tune Out: Ultimately by the sounds of the lyrics, this was one of those one night stand relationships that eventually end with a prostitute type girl replacing the lost lover. So, if you take away the circumstances of the song and just focus on the loss and heartbreak in the vocals....

Top Lyric That Could Make You Sound Like a Creeper:I smelled your scent on the seatbelt/ and kept my shortcuts to myself

3. Brianstorm (Favourite Worst Nightmare)

What's to Like: This song keeps the high speed intensity of the first album tracks without making the guitar sound overly aggressive. There's a little breakdown moment with just the drums and vocals that is really strangely catchy. The lyrics paint a strange picture of a strange fellow, but in a likable way that is easy enough to follow when you're not focusing on the hard rock instrumentals.

Tune Out: I got nothing for this one. It's their best rock'n'roll song.

Choice Lyric That Sets the Tone: Cause we can't take our eyes off your t-shirt and ties combination

2. Dance Little Liar (Humbug)

What's to Like: Despite a well paced and thumping drumbeat, the strange guitar tones keep things slow and melancholy. This is a contemplative type of song, almost cinematic in how the lyrics tell a story of conflict and the instruments carry emotional weight to them. It's hauntingly beautiful in a way despite the tragedy in the vocals. This song also carries the signature song structure of the Humbug songs where they start soft and slow but end in a very loud rambunctious din.

Tune Out: It's a song about a person in a committed relationship who is trying to cover their cheating affair.

Top Lyric That Let's You Know Things Are Dark: When there's dirt beneath the dirt....When there's dirt between the dirt

Honorable Mentions

-Perhaps Vampires is a Bit Strong But... (WPSIA,TWIN): This one is goofy and probably not a favorite of most other fans compared to other songs on this first album. It's precisely the goofiness of the song that I most enjoy. Plus the jam is groovy and fun.

-Flourescent Adolescent (Favourite Worst Nightmare): This is one of those songs that sounds lighthearted and fun based on the instruments but when you pay attention to the lyrics it's actually kind of depressing. Another example of how suburban British life is not all fun and games for some people.

-Old Yellow Bricks (Favourite Worst Nightmare): It's just a really bouncy and fun song. Also, the kind of song that sounds like a fun concept for an album about the Wizard of Oz series.

-Potion Approaching (Humbug): This is a multi-layered song with various switches in pace and tone without going into the strangeness of prog rock but still contains strange sounding guitars and punchy drums.

-The Hellcat Spangled Shalalala (Suck It and See): I was close to putting this on the list because I wanted to showcase the gentle side of Arctic Monkeys even when they combine soft singing with electric buzzing guitars

-Do I Wanna Know (AM): In all honesty, a great majority of why I like this song is because Alex Turner uses an old, uniquely shaped 12-string electric guitar for it. This one was hard to get into because of how slow the drums were paced on this, as well as a crass music video. However, that guitar really adds bonus points to this song.

1. 505

What's to Like: That haunting keyboard humming throughout the entire song. The image-drive lyrics sung in a forlorn yet passionate way. The gentleness in the sounds of the beginning followed by the intensity near the end. The teamwork in the instruments to stay in the background until things explode in the final verse. It's the kind of song that feels relatable even if you have not been in this specific situation before or not really been in love like this before. The whole atmosphere is urban yet it has a neo-western feel to it as well.

Tune Out: Perhaps the extended reverberation on the guitar can get annoying after awhile.

Most Heartbreaking Lyric: It seems that once again you've had to greet me with 'Goodbye'.

Turning Staycation Into Vacation

This past weekend, it had been my intention to go with my dad to the Smoky Mountains for a quick four day getaway. However, our plans were altered mainly due to strong predictions that the weather was not going to be fun weather to camp in and would ultimately ruin a short vacation anyway. Since I had already submitted for PTO and had not taken a break from work in awhile, I decided to go ahead and take a "vacation" anyway.

The problem is that with most forecasts predicting rain for half the vacation time and without the desire to scramble together a last minute four day weekend roadtrip, I was ultimately left with a "staycation", sitting around the house all weekend with no particular plans. At least, that's how I felt on Thursday when looking at things. However, as the weekend has gone by, I've made it a commitment to take advantage of this free time and treat it as if I really were far away from home and not in my every day setting with routines.

It wasn't all big and grand. Shoot, most of my weekend involved sitting and being in the car. However, I truly felt that without my normal routine and doing things out of the ordinary, I had found some small way of making a staycation feel more like a true vacation that I haven't had in a good chunk of time. Here's how. Please also bear in mind that I'm an unmarried young adult, so my experiences may differ from your.

-Put the road in Road Trip: I was already planning on spending two full days stuck in my car during my initial vacation plans. I might as well carry on and hit the road as long as there wasn't a storm stopping me. My dad and I took a quick trip up to Hannibal and back on Friday (about 4 hours of just driving and sitting, mind you). On Saturday, I decided to do a quick pilgrimage and spent an equal chunk of time circling around central Missouri where I stopped at various Catholic places I came across.

Part of the point of driving around so much was just to see the sights. I had never really seen most of the spots I was passing through, and it was cool seeing gorgeous riverways, thick tree covered hills, and little historic towns along the way. Missouri is a gorgeous state to drive through in my opinion and this weekend emphasized that beauty in my eyes.

-Take pictures: Generally if you're on vacation, you're almost guaranteed to have a camera in your hand. Since it's an unusual/ brand new setting and you're likely to not see things the same way again, you want to capture an image to preserve the memory of the thing or place you stopped at on vacation. Well, as I said before, I had not really been to some of the places I drove through over the weekend, so I had to have my camera on my phone at the ready at all times.

Part of my Saturday adventure naturally came with the need for a camera. I intentionally sought out these Catholics churches and shrines on a very particular route. This is because one random side hobby of mine is to collect pictures of different Catholic churches, statues, and icons and create an album of those pictures on my Facebook page. It's not very detailed, and in some cases I'm literally doing a drive-by and taking a quick pic before moving on. However, having the camera gave me a mission and purpose on an otherwise wandering experience.

-Check out the local fare: Tons of small towns and new places have something interesting to offer when it comes to their food and drinks. Purchasing such foods and drinks helps support small, family businesses and it gives you a taste of something you may not otherwise have consumed before or after.

I didn't do too much of this. I did make a pit stop though on my journey Saturday. In the town of Washington, I sought out an ice cream joint to cool off on a warm afternoon. I found Dairy Delight and tried their scoops of Mint Chip and Raspberry Truffle ice cream. Both sweet and cool. Had I been better prepared, I would have tried some other foods at the little festivals going on in Washington or Hermann that day, or I would've made a pit stop at the Daniel Boone Brewfest if I wasn't by myself. So, not a total success in this area of vacation experiences, but at least I can say I tried something local, something different and I enjoyed it.

-Put a good movie on: Of course, I did spend some time at home each day, mainly in the evenings when the rain was most likely to come down and I had had my fill of outdoorsy stuff during the day. Sometimes on vacation, especially after a day of being on the road, you just gotta sit back, relax, and put something good on TV. That was one of my favorite things about road trips growing up, having access to cable TV in hotel rooms so I could surf for multiple movies and TV shows I wouldn't have otherwise had access to. This past weekend I just decided to watch "Saving Private Ryan" because I knew it was a good movie, but I hadn't seen it in so long and I wanted to make sure it really held up since I put it on my Valuable Films List.

-Take advantage of good weather: The main purpose of a vacation, such as camping, is to be outside and to explore natural settings. This can only work when the weather cooperates by either being warm, sunny, or at least not raining.

Because the forecast called for rain for half of my vacation weekend, I knew I had to get outside whenever the weather was good. I went to the driving range a couple of times as well as played a round of golf on Monday. I went for a walk with my mom on Sunday in a park I had never really been to before. I checked out grottos and statues in the woodlands outside of a shrine. Even just the driving around was an attempt to take advantage of good or sunny weather (it made for some spectacular views) so that I didn't stay cooped up in my house.

-Don't worry about regular life too much: Since on a vacation you're normally far away from the stresses of work and extracurricular activities, I attempted the same concept for my staycation weekend. Granted, it was hard. I had all this free time to worry about Crossroads (Catholic young adult ministry) plans, looking at different job opportunities, and just scheduling my future in general. However, even Scripture tells us not to worry and to not put so much focus on tomorrow but rather be present in the present. So, if I ever thought of a different task to take care of, I just told myself "Well, it's going to have to wait until after my vacation", a similar concept to when I rest on Sunday and don't worry about work or chores when I have the whole day free.

-Blast the jams: What's a vacation roadtrip without music? Whether it's to keep the mind occupied or to keep me awake, music is always a big part of my vacation experiences. This weekend, I dug into the recent discography of an indie country blues musician named Parker Millsap as well as listened to more of the acoustic folk tunes of the Oh Hellos. Even on Saturday evening when I was just relaxing, I went back to some Arctic Monkeys music I hadn't heard in awhile.

-Spend time with family: All of my vacations growing up were with my parents and my brother, so it comes naturally to me to equate vacation time with family time. I made time during the extended weekend to spend time individually with my dad, my mom, and my brother, just catching up and chatting in ways I do not get to do on a regular basis.

Keeler’s Valuable Films List

As I may have mentioned in previous posts, I am a fan of the Vatican Film List. A list of 45 movies organized under three categories of "Religion" "Morality" and "Art". While there are still plenty of movies on that list that I need to see, it got me thinking of what my own 45 movies list would look like. So I made one.

Neither of these lists are "Best" or "Need-to-See" lists per se, but they are best stated as simply "Important" movies worth checking out. The Vatican Film List was actually compiled to celebrate the exact 100 year anniversary since the beginning of film making. My list is perhaps more simply just great movies that I have seen, made from early years of film making to present day. I repeat, these are simply movies that I have personally seen and may not even be the very best of their category, especially since it's just subjective personal opinion.

For my list, I decided to use three categories as well, but my labels include "Catholic", "Moral Value", and "Artistic Value". This is an attempt to separate my list from the other and to try to match my criteria for valuable movies with quality movies that represent the Catholic faith. The movies listed under each category are not in any particular order of rank, just a simple list of 15 movies that best represent each category. I tried as best I could to not repeat Vatican Film List picks, but some of these movies I put on the list BECAUSE I only watched them after seeing them on the Vatican Film List and I was impressed by their film making. Under the "Artistic Value" category, I chose 15 films to represent 15 different genres or styles of film. Also, I repeat, these are only movies that I have personally seen.

Catholic

-Of Gods and Men (2010)

-I Confess (1953)

-Roma, Citta Aperta (1945)

-The Flowers of St. Francis (1950)

-On the Waterfront (1954)

-Going My Way (1944)

-Henry V (1989)

-The Rite (2011)

-Calvary (2014)

-A Man for All Seasons (1966)

-The Song of Bernadette (1943)

-Becket (1964)

-Monsieur Vincent (1947)

-The Scarlet and the Black (1983)

-The Passion of the Christ (2004)

Talking Points: This is basically my list of 10 Highly Recommendable Catholic Movies with some extras thrown in, so I'm only going to explain just a few of my choices here.

I did not watch I Confess until after creating my previous list. I consider it to be an underrated Hitchcock classic. It’s a great examination of the Seal of the Confessional and also humanizes priests as men who know what love and romance is even before being ordained. The end goes a little goofy, but it’s the dedication that each character has toward achieving their desired goal that drives this movie's great use of tension. In a movie where you already know the answer to the mystery, it sure is thrilling.

Roma: Citta Aperta shares many similarities with The Scarlet and the Black since they both deal with the Nazi occupation of Rome during World War II and the stealthy response from the Catholics in and out of the Vatican.  What separates the two is Roma is an Italian movie made right on the heels of the end of World War II, filmed right within Rome itself, which emphasizes the realism of the movie.

The Flowers of St. Francis, the English translation of the title of this Italian film, is a series of vignettes focused on how St. Francis founded the Franciscan Order and some of the stories about him and his first monks during that time. I’m told that real monks were used in the supporting roles, which adds to the realism, and it really really makes you believe that you are watching slices of life about this saint and his companions right in the 13^th century.

Moral Value

-Babette’s Feast (1987)

Moral of the Story: Food is awesome and you never know when your simple good deeds will provide unforeseen rewards

-The Bicycle Thief (1948)

Moral of the Story: Just because someone does an evil deed to you, is it justifiable for you to also do an evil deed out of desperation?

-It’s a Wonderful Life (1946)

Moral of the Story: Helping people is worthwhile and bears fruit, even when you cannot see it on a regular basis.

-Schindler’s List (1993)

Moral of the Story: It is better to give than to receive and people have worth. Also, Nazis are evil.

-The Last Samurai (2003)

Moral of the Story: Redemption is possible.

-The Quiet Man (1952)

Moral of the Story: Peace is the ultimate good, but true strength and courage are required to move forward.

-The Lord of the Ring: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001)

Moral of the Story: You don't have to be grand or big to do something heroic. Also, evil is bad and good is good.

-The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (2007)

Moral of the Story: Killing the bad guy is not always the right answer.

- Master & Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003)

Moral of the Story: There's a difference between the obligation of duty and personal ambition.

-Groundhog Day (1993)

Moral of the Story: Helping people is more important than your own selfish desires.

-The Prestige (2006)

Moral of the Story: Revenge can only lead to disastrous consequences.

-Sergeant York (1941)

Moral of the Story: Killing is wrong, but sometimes you've got to step up and save people.

-The Mission (1986)

Moral of the Story: There's always a chance for forgiveness and peace is the right way to live. Also, colonialism is evil.

-Lilies of the Field (1963)

Moral of the Story: Community is vital to life and sometimes you can find a mission and purpose in places you wouldn't expect.

-Au Revoir Les Enfants (1987)

Moral of the Story:Community is vital to life and you can make friends with anyone if you give them a chance. Also, not all Nazis are evil?

Artistic Value

-Animation: Princess Mononoke (1997)

I was close to copying the Vatican Film List and putting Fantasia in this slot since it is such a piece of high quality art and the hard work has withstood the test of time, but I think that this choice showcases an entire history of animation within its runtime. Hayao Miyazaki and his Studio Ghibli are one of the most renowned animation companies today because they bring a specific artistic style, rooted in their country’s culture and history, to life. The shots of nature and the spirits that inhabit the world are gorgeous, but the animation is also not afraid to give time to the grotesque and violent. If you wanted to prove the value of hand-drawn 2D animation in the modern context, this movie is the best way to go about it.

-Western: Stagecoach (1939)

While I considered other options, including other John Wayne movies, this is the definitive Western to me. The actors portray two things: caricatures of cliché Western characters and people with heavy personal struggles based on their pasts. There’s the gun play and horse riding that Westerns are known for, the location shots are infamous in their ability to define the genre, and the people all seem like they come straight from the last couple decades of the 19^th century in Southwest United States. It's reserved in the gritty violence and anti-heroism that later defined the western genre and instead allows genuine humor and drama to create an enduring story and heartfelt characters.

-Comedy: Hot Fuzz (2007)

This movie is comedic in how serious it presents itself. It knows how to spoof a genre properly while simultaneously tell its own unique story. This movie invites multiple viewings because of the little inside jokes and clues it leaves along the way. Despite some profanity and modern mindsets, it is never vulgar and nowhere near as inappropriate as most other movies passing themselves off as "comedies". The characters are all cooky and fun, as are the action scenes in the last third of the movie. Seriously, the delivery of the lines in this movie is so dry and dramatic that you can't help but laugh at them. The reason this movie beats out the more quotable Big Lebowski is this one actually has a coherent plot and has restraint in areas that Lebowski lacks.

-Horror: Psycho (1960)

For the record, other horror movies like The Exorcist and even The Conjuring were in close contention for making this list. However, sometimes the natural is even scarier than the supernatural, and Psycho is the best popular example of something macabre happening in ordinary life. All of the most thrilling scenes are memorable because of their power of suggestive fright, including the shower scene, the basement scene, and the final shot of the movie. The black and white cinematography on top of the music score adds so much atmosphere to what may otherwise just be a melodrama with some absurd moments. This work is also one of the most accessible movies of the horror genre since it does not rely on gruesome blood effects and demonic voices.

-Science Fiction: Star Wars (1977)

I know. I’m surprised by this myself. I spend so much time acknowledging the Star Wars movies as just average movies given overrated praise by fanboys. Yet, if I had to pick one movie that encapsulated science-fiction and was a good representation of influence from the past and insight into the future of filmmaking, it would have to be the original Star Wars movie. There’s different planets, laser weapons, robots, space travel, alien creatures, and some philosophical dialogue. The ability of the filmmaking team to utilize little models and standard technology to create such life-like imagery is worth commending. 

-Documentary: It Might Get Loud (2008)

 I cannot say that I’m watched too many documentaries before and I am sure that there are others that deserve higher praise than this one. For my own part though, from the documentaries that I have seen overall, this is the one I hold as a standard to compare the quality of other documentaries I see. It tells its story of the history of the electric guitar, thereby the history of rock music, from different angles in a fun, entertaining, and engaging way. All three guitarists bring a different perspective and represent a different period in rock’n’roll. You want the movie to keeping going as it heads toward the finale and you want to rewatch because of the great music and the intriguing behind-the-scenes approach you're given into the world of rock music.

-Adventure: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)

If there was one movie that had the atmosphere and fun of old school adventure movies with modern technology and respectable dialogue, it's Raiders. The introductory scene especially looks and feels like it could've been made back in the 40s, but the longer the movie goes on, not only does it get better, but it gets bolder and more spectacular, like a modern movie. You get all of the exotic locations and fight scenes that action adventures are known for, as well as the intriguing relationships that are found in love interests, sidekicks, and bad guys. And who doesn't love a movie where Nazis are the bad guys? The characters are not caricatures or cliches, but they are also allowed to be a little melodramatic in proper movie fashion. The imagery, the locations, and the quotes from this movie are all memorable.

-War: Saving Private Ryan (1998)

There are some war movies that are all about the gunplay and get you pumped up by the exciting action. There are some war movies that are more focused on the philosophies about war, violence, and peace and don't care too much about the weaponry. There are some war movies that just want to recreate for you what happened during World War II. Saving Private Ryan is all of the above. You get such gritty violent realism that it can be hard to make it past the opening scene. There are plenty of other tense and bloody action scenes that honestly depict the horrific violence involved in war. The movie also takes time to build its characters in quiet moments, giving us insight and understanding about war from regular Joes who had nothing to do with the military before the US got involved in WWII. Despite how gruesome the movie can be, it's also worth repeated viewings and pays tribute to regular but real heroes.

-Silent: Modern Times (1936)

Just like the documentary category, I can't say I've sat through many silent movies, so I don't have much to back up this choice. I saw this movie because it was on the Vatican Film List and I can see why it was chosen. There's some thematic exploration of ideas in the industrial work world of the time as well as some interestingly choreographed scenes. Charlie Chaplin has remained popular for his comedy for a reason, and he knows how to make people laugh with goofy faces, body language, and awkward situations. Even the few moments of sound and dialogue are not necessary for this movie to function well. It works because of the grand set pieces, the goofy interaction between the characters, and the physical way that the story is told.

-Black & White: Seven Samurai (1954)

Again, this is one genre that I do not have too much experience with, so out of my limited knowledge of movies that fit this category, I think Seven Samurai fits the best. Under this heading, you might think I'm also talking about modern movies that are shot in black and white, like Sin City, The Artist, or Schindler's List, but those movies are just copying an artistic style, mainly an artistic style that existed at an older time when colored movies were too experimental or too expensive to produce. What also separates this category from something like the Silent movie genre is how dialogue and sound impacts the movie experience.

I do not think this movie would work in a new, colored setting, which is why any remake of this movie has had to set their project in a different time and location. The lights and shadows in this movie leave an impact on how the viewer understands characters and their motives. You do not need to have all the color that later Kurosawa samurai movies have to appreciate the spectacle of the realistic costumes and props. The action scenes, once you get to them, are thrilling even when they're quiet. The dialogue is poetic while remaining realistic, and there's even moments where tension is built up because of a lack of dialogue so that when you do finally hear something screamed or whispered it gives you an emotional punch. The clash of the sword, the sound of horses trotting, and gruff Japanese voices all bring history to life in a way a silent movie cannot.

-Superhero: The Avengers (2012)

The Dark Knight is probably the best made movie involving a comic book hero . However, if there was one movie that you could use as the definitive superhero movie, meaning that it tells a full comic book story in a semi-realistic-mostly-fantastical way with a cast of colorful characters that gives you the whole arc of emotions within comic books, I'd argue that The Avengers is that one definitive movie. You get all of the action that's involved in comic books, including urban destruction in a major city. You get all of the special powers that superheroes are known to have as well as the futuristic high tech gadgetry. You get the good vs. evil storyline with some plot twist elements. Finally, you get the humor and character interactions that bring some lighthearted goodness into a setting that would otherwise be gritty and depressing.

-High Art: Tree of Life (2011)

Many movies that are high art "arthouse" pieces come off as arrogant, slow, and involved in too much thinking to be enjoyed by anyone other than movie snobs who live off of watching movies that the general masses despise. However, I think that Tree of Life is an accessible and worthwhile arthouse movie if the viewer is willing to let it guide them on the journey. For my full take on what makes Tree of Life so great, read my review here.

-Romantic Comedy: The Princess Bride (1987)

             
This movie is quite literally the definition of a genre. It is primarily a romance focused on two lovers fighting to be with one another amongst beautiful locations, with soft serene music in the background. It is also primarily a comedy with witty word play and sarcastic dialogue leaping from the actors’ mouths. Now, you might usually just associate this movie with adventure or comedy, but I think the romance is an important aspect of the plot as well as the characters. It also is not anywhere near as crude or modern as most movies that are usually put under this genre category. The Princess Bride is something that both women and men, kids and adults, can watch and enjoy time and again.

-Musical: Fiddler on the Roof (1971)

            
 If you are going to turn a stage musical into a film, it has to be a different experience than just watching something live on stage. These live musicals on TV are essentially just watching a stage production through the scope of a TV screen. Some musicals, like Joseph….Dreamcoat, do the same thing by introducing their movie as a show within a show. A movie version of a musical needs to transport you to physical locations, bringing the setting to real life. That’s the fault of most classic musicals, the characters are still clearly on sets and sound stages. A movie version of a musical also needs to stand on its own as a good piece of art without relying on the quality of the stage version. That’s the fault of Les Miserables and Phantom of the Opera, their stage versions are so good that you’d rather see them live than watch the inferior movie versions, which also means that quality of the singing comes into play. Based on all this criteria and given my love for Catholicism in movies, you’d might think that this means that Sound of Music would fit in this slot.

However, my pick for this spot is actually Fiddler on the Roof and this is for a few different reasons. One reason is atmosphere. Fiddler on the Roof really provides some serious atmosphere and does so with reverence to the spirituality of its people as well as the place that it is set in. You truly believe that you are in a poor village in rural Russia, even in moments when they’re filming on a sound stage. The movie is not afraid to slowly roam over the landscape or quietly allow the emotions of the moment to settle in. Sound of Music has some good atmosphere and quiet moments, but its focus seems to be to travel quickly from moment to moment to tell the story at a quick pace. Sound of Music as a movie also takes some liberties with the story of the musical, moving songs and moments to places different than where they are in the stage production. Fiddler on the Roof is the exact same story in both movie and stage versions. There's also the reverence of the religion of its characters. Sound of Music has some scenes involving Catholicism, but it's not pervasive in the characters' lives, even Maria who struggles with her vocation. Fiddler puts a sharp focus on Judaism and how it impacts the lives and culture of the people in Anatevka. The songs, character movements, and set pieces are rooted in the religion of the main characters.

-Sports: The Sandlot (1993)

I dare you to find a movie that loves its sport as much as The Sandlot loves baseball. While some sports movies use the sport as a vehicle to push the theme or purpose of the story (*cough*RemembertheTitans*cough*), the characters of The Sandlot love to play baseball because of how fun it is. You see them enjoying the pitching, catching, throwing, and sweating of baseball, as well as the rivalries and camaraderie that stems from building a baseball team. The heroes and legends within the movie are surrounded in the atmosphere of baseball. The movie is incredibly quotable, just as fun to watch as a kid as an adult, and you learn some life lessons without it being too obvious and hard hitting.

Top 10 Small Movies of Summer 2017

Recently, I made my prediction for the Top 10 highest grossing movies of the 2017 summer season in the United States, ranked in order so that the #1 will earn the most money overall. It's just a fun little wager that is driven by my curiosity of which movies people are most likely to spend their hard earned money on. The list is as follows:

1. Cars 3
2. Guardians of the Galaxy 2
3. Despicable Me 3
4. Spiderman: Homecoming
5. Wonder Woman
6. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales
7. Transformers: The Last Knight
8. War of the Planet of the Apes
9. The Mummy
10. Baywatch

When I posted the list on Facebook, I got a variety of comments making different guesses or saying where they thought I was guessing incorrectly. There was one comment, though, noting that there were no original movies at all in this Top 10, with a further comment noting how there is no more originality and creativity when it comes to stories in movies we see today. 

This got me thinking on the nature of summer movies. If we look at last summer's movies, it is a very similar environment to this year. All of the highest grossing summer movies were part of established franchises, with very basic stories and characters and even though they looked nice, the stories themselves just were not well written, meaning that they were average or bad movies. That's not to say all of the movies were bad, just that they were either based on a previously established story/ franchise before it or that the writing lacked any spark of imagination, or both. Meanwhile there were several "indie" movies or less talked about movies, like Kubo and the Two Strings, Swiss Army Man, and Sing Street, that hardly anyone was going to see in the movie theater even though the people that did see the movies all talked about how awesome they were.

I'm sure some of these movies on the above 2017 Top 10 list are going to be good, entertaining, quality movies worth seeing. I myself am excited to see Guardians, Spiderman, and Despicable Me even. I'm also even more certain that many of the movies on the same list are going to be trashy, surface-level, noisy, just-overall-BAD movies that I think people should stop spending their money on. 

So, in an attempt to try to balance the scales, and to prove that there are still quality stories coming out this summer to movies theaters, I've compiled another Top 10 list. This Top 10, which you'll soon find below, consists of movies that would fall under the "indie" category, with smaller movie studios with smaller budgets. You'll like not have seen much marketing or heard much word about majority of these movies unless you're a movie snob who has ingested all the information from the film festival circuit or otherwise watched the trailers like I had to do when I found these on IMDB.

Obviously I've not yet seen any of the below movies, so I cannot truly judge if they are good or bad, but their premises and trailers are intriguing enough to be worthy of interest. I will provide the ratings for each movie since these are likely to be darker and more mature than many of the other movies coming out this summer and therefore discretion is advised. I'm not going to applaud a movie for its inappropriate content (sex scenes, nudity, obscene amounts of profanity) and each movie needs to be evaluated individually before you think it is appropriate enough to see it. So this list is just a way to inform you that these movies exist and on the surface, before they're released to the general public, seem potentially more worthwhile on spending money to go see than my other list. The below list is ranked according to my interest/ perceived value of the movie in question (i.e. #1=Most Interest/ Best Value; #10= Least Interest/ Riskiest Value)

Ultimately, I'm just one man with one opinion. However, if I could cause some little bit of change for something as silly yet impactful as the choice of movies we see and support financially, I'd be mighty pleased. At the end of the day, remember that the big movie studios are only going to provide finances to movies that they think will rake in the cash, so if you want to see less blockbuster trash and more substantial storytelling, pay for movie tickets for movies like the ones below.

1. Dunkirk (Release Date: July 21)

Yes, I topped my list with a Christopher Nolan movie and I'm sure you're ready to call me out as a hypocrite for including such a big name with big money on a small, indie movies list. However, if Christopher Nolan's name wasn't attached to this movie, would you know that this was a big budget Hollywood production or even know that this movie exists? I include it on this list because I really do think it looks worth checking out and I do think that it should be in the Top 10 highest grossing list. So many good actors in a story of valor and bravery. However, since this is not a franchise movie and it's a war drama, the likelihood that people are going to purchase truckloads of tickets just because it's directed by Christopher Nolan is unlikely.

Rating: PG-13 for violence and language

2. Baby Driver (Release Date: June 28)

Okay, now Edgar Wright is on this list and I'm still not a hypocrite...right? Seriously though, the same idea with Christopher Nolan applies to Baby Driver. Not as many people would even know of this movie at this point if Edgar Wright's name wasn't attached, nor would it look so sleek and shiny with such a handsome budget. Yet, the blend of action and humor are still there, as is the quirkiness that is allowed in smaller budget movies. It looks like a fun summer action movie with some dark comedy and even a little romance thrown into the mix. Essentially this could please the action junkie crowd that loves smash-em-up summer blockbusters AND the comedy seekers who just want to have a good laugh in the summer.

Rating: The official rating hasn't been released as of yet, but the best guess is R mainly for violence and language

3. Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets (Release Date: July 21)

This is the last of my summer picks that may have some serious street cred to it since the director is responsible for The Professional and The Fifth Element, and the movie has the likes of Dane DeHaan, Cara Delevingne, Ethan Hawke, and Clive Owen in the lead acting roles, all well recognizable and known at this point. This is going to be the sci-fi movie experience of the summer, with the zaniness of Mad Max Fury Road mixed in with the special effects and universe setting of Star Trek. This could be a case of style over substance, where the visual eye candy overpowers a simple storyline, but at least it also looks like it's trying to shoot for a unique sci-fi experience that's both fun and adventurous. If the story it was based on and the actors involved were more popular, this might have a shot at being in the Top 10 Highest Grossing, and I will be pleasantly surprised if that actually happens (as is the case with my above two choices on this list).

Rating: PG-13 for violence, suggestive material, and brief language

4. It Comes At Night (Release Date: June 9)

Horror movies seem to have become part of the summer movie season in recent years, and last year had some memorably good ones, most especially The Conjuring 2. If you're looking to get your horror movie fix this summer, the best bet looks like this one. The trailer doesn't really give much away, nor does the description, but everything is so bizarre and intense. There's people in gas masks, dirty faces, fires, creepy doors, cramped spaces in the dark, guns being pointed at people, and everyone sounds freaked out.

Rating: R for violence, language, and disturbing images

5. The Book of Henry (Release Date: June 16)

At first this movie seems like it's going to focus on a family drama. Naomi Watts is the mother of a boy who is a super genius (like we haven't seen this kind of thing before) and they're both trying to fit in in their normal suburban life while the son tries to help his mom without dominating the relationship. THEN the rest of the trailer is this dark mystery that seems to involve rescuing a little girl from an abusive relationship, with much more suspense and action than the first half would lead us to believe. The movie totally balances the line between Oscar-bait slow indie drama and cult classic dark indie drama.

Rating: PG-13 for thematic elements and brief strong language

6. The Wall (Release Date: May 12)

A war drama that seems to actually not have too much action. Aaron Taylor Johnson and John Cena (really, John Cena in a drama?) are military guys targeted by an enemy sniper in the desert. As they attempt to take out the enemy with nothing but open desert and a small crumbling wall for cover, Johnson must deal with his injured partner as well as not let the enemy mess with his head via radio communication. Modern warfare meets character study, sounds interesting enough to me.

Rating: R for some language and violence

7. Meaghan Leavey (Release Date: June 9)

All right, you've got a quality leading lady in a movie also directed by a woman. It's even got a dog in a supporting role in a movie based on a true story. That should be enough to draw anybody in to a seat in the theater. Sure, it's another action drama movie about the modern military , but if people want there to be more lead acting jobs and directing jobs for women, going to see this movie is just one small simple action that can help. Plus it's got some solid actors that you can trust to bring good performances overall.

Rating: PG-13 for violence, language, suggestive content, and thematic elements

8. The Hero (Release Date: June 9)

Sam Elliot plays himself, or a blend of himself and Adam West, as an older man known for acting roles in the past who is blocked from further good work because everyone associates him with the past. It seems like the kind of movie made for folks of the older generation as well as anybody who is struggling with being productive in their careers in a purposeful way. I would caution that it seems like there would be some inappropriate material (the dude is having a relationship with a much younger woman), but hopefully it won't make up much of the movie.

Rating: R for drug use, language, and some sexual content

9. Maudie (Release Date: June 16)

This is the most Oscar-bait looking movie of the bunch, so if you're looking for a slow quiet drama to cool you down this summer this may be your best bet. It's about a middle aged woman, who is talented as well as handicapped, and her budding relationship with the grumpy loner middle aged man she works for. The woman character is strong and resilient, but not in a cliche way that the blockbusters make their characters to be, but she seems to overcome obstacles both by her own strength and the strength she receives from her relationships to other people. And also, it's a movie written and directed by women, which I only point out because people talk about the need for greater diversity and leadership in the movie industry and it's not going to happen if audiences don't pay to see movies when it happens (I'm sure there's other variables, but at least this is one variable that the movie viewers themselves can control).

Rating: PG-13 for thematic content and brief sexuality

10. A Ghost Story (Release Date: July 7)

If you're looking for a bizarre thinking man's movie to keep your brain active this summer, maybe look into this movie. The trailer and description are almost incomprehensible, but in a good way since they only reveal just enough to peak your curiosity. Something about Casey Affleck walking around in a ghost blanket in a house throughout history while the characters talk about love and death and life and time and all those good philosophical buzz words. But hey, Casey Affleck won an award for being in a highly acclaimed Oscar drama last year and the director was in charge of Pete's Dragon last year (as well as some other previous indie projects), so it's got some credibility to it. It doesn't seem like the kind of movie that is going to get a wide release or at least be in movie theaters for too long, so get out to your local indie joint as quick as possible.

Rating: R for brief language and A disturbing image

Post Script: You'll notice I didn't have movies like Alien: Covenant and The Dark Tower on the list (shame of me, right). Again, this is all personal opinion, so if those movies or others I missed look worth checking out to you, by all means go do it. I'm just trying to throw some support and love to smaller budget movies with bigger ideas and tons of character.

Another thing you'll notice is NONE of these movies that I mentioned in this list are PG or G. That's mainly because...families are really out of luck with movie choices this summer. SERIOUSLY, there's almost nothing for families to go see this summer that isn't rated PG-13. Aside from Cars and Despicable Me, the only other real decent movie for everyone is the Captain Underpants movie, which in my opinion looks more style over substance AND came out 10 years too late (but what do I know, maybe kids love the book series as much as my peers did back in the day). Otherwise, families will have settle for either The Emoji Movie or The Nut Job 2 and...no, just no....just don't give your money to these movies, people!